Snort mailing list archives
Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue
From: "Carter Waxman \(cwaxman\) via Snort-users" <snort-users () lists snort org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:47:14 +0000
If these were taken with a similar run time, your performance is better with AFPacket. Analyzed is the number of
packets actually processed by Snort. In PCAP, received means “seen by libpcap,” since its managing its own packet
queuing above the network driver, where in AFPacket it means “pulled off of the driver’s queue before being pruned.” In
both cases, dropped represents “pruned from underlying queue / not seen by Snort.”
From: Snort-users <snort-users-bounces () lists snort org> on behalf of Qinwen Hu <qhu009 () aucklanduni ac nz>
Date: Saturday, June 16, 2018 at 6:24 PM
To: "snort-users () lists snort org" <snort-users () lists snort org>
Subject: [Snort-users] Snort 3.0 performance issue
Hi everyone.
I am using Snort++ 3.0 to do some performance tests. We set up two scenarios:
1. Running a single flow on a 100Gb high-speed network. Both Pcap and AFPack DAQ work as expected. AF_Packet captured
all the packets and no packet loss. PCAP dropped few packets.
2. Running multiple flows with different delays on the same network. This time AFPacket had a bad performance when we
compared with PCAP in terms of the received packet. For instance
daq (Pcap)
received: 695471792
analyzed: 14603352
dropped: 680868440
daq (AFPacket)
received: 16774888
analyzed: 16774888
dropped: 699072874
From my understanding, I thought AFPacket will have a better performance than PCAP. But why I got different results in
here? Besides, I am wondering, when I can configure the search methods( ac-bnfa, ac_q or ac-split) in Snort 3.0?
Here is some information about our testing service
Version:Snort++ 3.0.0-243
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6136 CPU @ 3.00GHz * 24 cores
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Steven
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists snort org Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news! Please follow these rules: https://snort.org/faq/what-is-the-mailing-list-etiquette
Current thread:
- Snort 3.0 performance issue Qinwen Hu (Jun 16)
- Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue Carter Waxman (cwaxman) via Snort-users (Jun 19)
- Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue Qinwen Hu (Jun 19)
- Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue Carter Waxman (cwaxman) via Snort-users (Jun 20)
- Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue PUllarao via Snort-users (Jun 20)
- Fwd: Snort 3.0 performance issue Виктор Сурин via Snort-users (Jun 21)
- Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue Qinwen Hu (Jun 19)
- Re: Snort 3.0 performance issue Carter Waxman (cwaxman) via Snort-users (Jun 19)
