Snort mailing list archives
Question about CVE-2020-16898 Rules
From: "s.g Choi via Snort-sigs" <snort-sigs () lists snort org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:09:12 +0900
Hi, Talos Team I have a question about the CVE-2020-16898 rule you have distributed. This option is part of the CVE-2020-16898 rule in Snort subscription rules. ''' byte_test:1,!&,1,0,relative,bitmask 0x01; ''' As far as I know, this is an option to determine whether it's odd or even in ICMPv6 RDNSS length. Even odd numbers are enough to determind using bitwise & 1, I wonder why we should do bitmask operation. Best Regards, Choi
_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists snort org https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-sigs Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort! Please follow these rules: https://snort.org/faq/what-is-the-mailing-list-etiquette Visit the Snort.org to subscribe to the official Snort ruleset, make sure to stay up to date to catch the most <a href=" https://snort.org/downloads/#rule-downloads">emerging threats</a>!
Current thread:
- Question about CVE-2020-16898 Rules s.g Choi via Snort-sigs (Oct 20)
