tcpdump mailing list archives
net net/len (0.0.0.0)
From: Felipe Kellermann <stdfk () terra com br>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:26:53 -0300 (BRT)
I noticed 'net 0.0.0.0/0' filter compiles to a BPF code that differs from the alternative 'net mask' filter. All the others net filters I tried produced the same BPF code. Still haven't looked at the code -- is this resulting code known/intentional? Using pcap 0.9.4, src net 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0: (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 4 jf 2 (002) jeq #0x806 jt 4 jf 3 (003) jeq #0x8035 jt 4 jf 5 (004) ret #96 (005) ret #0 src net 0.0.0.0/0: (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 4 (002) ld [26] (003) jeq #0x0 jt 8 jf 9 (004) jeq #0x806 jt 6 jf 5 (005) jeq #0x8035 jt 6 jf 9 (006) ld [28] (007) jeq #0x0 jt 8 jf 9 (008) ret #96 (009) ret #0 -- Felipe Kellermann - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 27)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 27)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Guy Harris (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Guy Harris (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 27)