tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Packet arrival order
From: Ury Segal <ury_segal () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Hi!
I think you are seeing the same problem that I have described in my posting "Not receiving packets on Solaris, but no problems on Linux and
BSD". I think what we both need is the Solaris/DLPI equivalent to the BSD/BPF BIOCIMMEDIATE ioctl.
Do you happen to know what is the Solaris/DLPI equivalent to the BSD/BPF BIOCIMMEDIATE ioctl ? Thanks!
In my situation, I wrote a program (arp-scan) using libpcap on Linux, and it worked fine. When I ported it to BSD I needed to use the BIOCIMMEDIATE ioctl to avoid BPF buffering. I'm now porting it to Solaris and am not receiving packets, so I suspect that I need the appropriate method to avoid buffering in DLPI. Roy Hills
_________________________________________________________________
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/ - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
--ury - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Packet arrival order Ury Segal (Apr 02)
- Re: Packet arrival order roy hills (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order Eloy Paris (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order roy hills (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order Eloy Paris (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order roy hills (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order Eloy Paris (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order Eloy Paris (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order roy hills (Apr 03)
- Re: Packet arrival order Eloy Paris (Apr 03)
