tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default?
From: Gert Doering <gert () greenie muc de>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:07:18 +0100
Hi, On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:58:49PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:tcpdump is not actually *doing* any IPv6.It's doing IPv6 name resolution.
OK, good argument. Some IPv6 related stuff without actually sending
IPv6 packets (unless the resolver library does it internally) :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert () greenie muc de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert () net informatik tu-muenchen de
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Guy Harris (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Gert Doering (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Rick Jones (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Gert Doering (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Guy Harris (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Gert Doering (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Carter Bullard (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Guy Harris (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Carter Bullard (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Guy Harris (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Rick Jones (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Gert Doering (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Rick Jones (Feb 06)
- Re: Should we enable IPv6 support by default? Luis Martin (Feb 06)
