tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:12:43 -0800
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:05 AM, Schemmel, Hans-Christoph wrote:
The format of the additional header is: | Header_Size | Msg_ID | Freq_ID | Start_Pos | End_Pos | Flag | ... | Msg_ID | Freq_ID | Start_Pos | End_Pos | Flag | Direction | MUX_Frame Header_Size (1 Octet): Total length of the addtional header Msg_ID (1 Octet): ID of the PPP packet Freq_ID (1 Octet): ID of the PPP packet part, if the PPP packet is split into several parts Start_Pos (1 Octet): Beginning of the PPP packet in the information field of the MUX frame End_Pos (1 Octet): End of the packet in the information field Flag (1 Octet): If "Flag" is set, this is the last part of the fragmented/split packet Direction (1 Octet): Direction of the Mux frame: GSM Modem -> Host or Host -> GSM Modem
So are any of those fields optional? For example, is the fragment ID optional? If so, what indicates whether it's present? If nothing is optional, why is the header size not always 7? - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel, Hans-Christoph (Jan 10)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Jan 12)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Jan 12)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Jan 17)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Jan 17)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Jan 19)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Jan 20)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Jan 25)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Jan 26)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Feb 01)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Feb 03)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Feb 03)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Feb 04)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Feb 10)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Feb 14)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Feb 14)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Schemmel , Hans-Christoph (Jan 12)
- Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector Guy Harris (Jan 10)