Re: [tcpdump] Tcp fast open (#323)

[Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>]

Longinus00 <notifications () github com> wrote:
    > The final commit in my tcp_fast_open brach was never merged into the
    > upstream because of the issue with sequence number tracking. Handling
    > all the corner cases and getting a "correct" output would also
    > potentially create incompatibilites with programs that expect the
    > current sequence number interpretation of tcpdump.

The question is: why the change?
Why is the the correct answer?

_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers