Re: how many stable branches to have

[Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>]

Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
    >> I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd
    >> rather do that than have "old stable".  I'd rather call them something
    >like:
    >> wheezy-4.7
    >> or     centos7-4.7

    > So, if both Chocolate Coated Spinach Linux "Orangina" and Pink Frog BSD
    > 5.7 were released with tcpdump 4.7, would we have separate orangina-4.7
    > and pinkfrog5.7-4.7 branches for them?

I think that yes, we would, but clearly, we would want to not go crazy.
Are you planning any amphibian based BSD forks this year? :-)

_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers