tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:01:19 +0100
František Kučera <konference () frantovo cz> wrote:
> Dne 24. 03. 19 v 19:18 Guy Harris napsal(a):
>> So perhaps we need separate link-layer header types for "arbitrary
>> segment of a stream" (which would require TCP-like processing) and
>> "datagram"?
> UDS are bit weird from the layer point of view, because they are like
> TCP or UDP but on the other hand, there is nothing like IP under
> them. So it is a question whether UDS should be considered a link-layer
> or something above it.
pcapng is way better format for this kind of thing.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr () sandelman ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) František Kučera (Mar 23)
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) Guy Harris (Mar 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) František Kučera (Mar 24)
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) Guy Harris (Mar 24)
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) František Kučera (Mar 24)
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) Michael Richardson (Mar 25)
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) František Kučera (Mar 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) František Kučera (Mar 24)
- Re: Link-layer header type for unix domain sockets (UDS) František Kučera (Mar 24)
