tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: bpf_dump.c
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 23:05:50 -0800
On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:54 PM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> wrote:
They are also different: $ diff bpf_dump.c ../libpcap/bpf_dump.c 24,25c24 < #include "netdissect-stdinc.h" < ---#include <pcap.h>
That's because the first one is part of tcpdump and the second one is part of libpcap.
28,29c27 < #include "netdissect.h" < #include "interface.h" ---#include "optimize.h"
Ditto.
34c32 < struct bpf_insn *insn; ---const struct bpf_insn *insn;
It should be const, as it's not modifying the bpf_insn, just printing it.
55,56c53,56 < extern int bids[]; < printf(bids[i] > 0 ? "[%02d]" : " -- ", bids[i] - 1); ---if (i < NBIDS && bids[i] > 0) printf("[%02d]", bids[i] - 1); else printf(" -- ");
The "extern int bids[]" and the lack of "i < NBIDS" are due to libpcap not exporting the internal bids[] array and not exporting its size. The rest is just different ways of saying the same thing. Given that BDEBUG is a libpcap definition that affects a lot more things, my inclination would be to, if we keep tcpdump's bpf_dump.c, remove the BDEBUG stuff, as it's there only for doing libpcap debugging, in which case you're dealing with *our* libpcap, not with some other libpcap. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-leave () lists tcpdump org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
Current thread:
- bpf_dump.c Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Feb 09)
- Re: bpf_dump.c Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Feb 12)
- Re: bpf_dump.c Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Re: bpf_dump.c Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Re: bpf_dump.c Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Message not available
- Re: bpf_dump.c Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Feb 12)
- Re: bpf_dump.c Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Feb 12)
