tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP)
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 09:53:26 -0700
On Oct 8, 2025, at 8:18 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca> wrote:
rfc-editor () rfc-editor org wrote:Transport protocols are extended through the use of transport header options. This document updates RFC 768 (UDP) by indicating the location, syntax, and semantics for UDP transport layer options within the surplus area after the end of the UDP user data but before the end of the IP datagram.
OK, so does this finally make the Length field in the UDP header serve a useful purpose, or was there a purpose for it *before* this that I didn't know about? _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-leave () lists tcpdump org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
Current thread:
- updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Michael Richardson (Oct 08)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Francois via tcpdump-workers (Oct 08)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Guy Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Francois via tcpdump-workers (Oct 08)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Guy Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Bill Fenner (Oct 08)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Francois via tcpdump-workers (Oct 09)
- Re: updates needed to print-udp.c.. (was Re: RFC 9868 on Transport Options for UDP) Francois via tcpdump-workers (Oct 08)
