Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack
From: hacker () VUDU NET (Eric Hacker)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:50:47 -0500
Paul, I don't think you've missed on anything DHCP related. It does have that weakness, but that is not something that too many folks are going to be worried about. At my last job the network architect was so miserable at planning, DHCP pools would regularly run dry because too many legitimate clients were on the subnet. But lets look at the specifics: DHCP leases are allocated in pools to specific subnets. One can only get a lease on the subnet they are already on, since the router forwarding the request is going to identify the subnet the request is from (or something like that, I'm not referring to any of my technical docs at this point). If an attacker is already on the subnet and wants to cause some denial of service problems there are lots of other ways to do even more damage easily. One could simply ARP for the gateway, create broadcast storms etc. to cause mayhem. If there are remote ways to tie up DHCP leases, I would certainly be interested in hearing about them. Like I said, I didn't dig up the technical material to look for such possibilities. If anyone has any other ideas and wants to make me get up off my lazy ass and read some documentation, please feel free to comment. «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«» Eric Hacker, MCSE, CCSE hacker () vudu net Hacker is my real name. Please, no flames, no props... Just deal with it. -----Original Message----- From: VULN-DEV List [mailto:VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM]On Behalf Of Paul Keefer Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 4:20 PM To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM Subject: Possible DHCP DOS attack I hope this is the right forum for this. I was contemplating DHCP and how many large organizations rely on it today, and I had a vision so to speak. What if someone were to use up all of the available leases? That would essentially prevent anyone else from obtaining an address. That got me thinking to how easy it would be to very quickly eat up all the addresses on a server. It seems like it would be trivial to use a linux box to use proxy arping to send out a large number of DHCP requests until the server has no more to give out. This of course assumes that the network is not using switches that prevent multiple MACs per port, and that the DHCP servers are not configured to give IPs out only to specific MACs or something like that. One thing that would make this particularly insidious is that the entire attack would take only momemts, and would last until the DHCP database was purged or the leases timed out. Has this already been addressed? Am I missing something fundamental about DHCP?
Current thread:
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home, (continued)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home CyberPsychotic (Jan 31)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Oliver Friedrichs (Feb 01)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Iván Arce (Feb 02)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Oliver Friedrichs (Feb 01)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Sen_Ml Sen_Ml (Feb 01)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Kerneels (Feb 02)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Granquist, Lamont (Feb 03)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Steffen Zahn (Feb 04)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Sen_Ml Sen_Ml (Feb 01)
- Possible DHCP DOS attack Paul Keefer (Feb 02)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack Sebastian Andersson (Feb 02)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack Eric Hacker (Feb 03)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack C.J. Oster (Feb 03)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack Erik Fichtner (Feb 03)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack Matthew S. Hallacy (Feb 03)
- DHCP and Security Nitzenberger, Rob, MSgt, AF/XORR (Feb 03)
- Re: DHCP and Security Erik Fichtner (Feb 03)
- Re: DHCP and Security Seth R Arnold (Feb 04)
- Re: DHCP and Security Jeff Bachtel (Feb 05)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack Michal Zalewski (Feb 03)
- Re: Possible DHCP DOS attack Blue Boar (Feb 03)
