Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
MiM Simultaneous close attack
From: "Korhan Kaya" <kkaya () prioriy1world com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:37:39 +0300
MiM simultaneous CLOSE attack
Revision 1.1
For Public Release 2001 August 07 08:00 (GMT +0200)
_________________________________________________________________
Vulnerability :
MiM simultaneous CLOSE attack
Vendor :
N/A
Category :
Man in the middle / Denial of service
Date :
08/07/2001
Credits :
Korhan Kaya <kkaya () priority1world com>
Document ID : MW-TCPMD-03
Contents
1 Summary
2 Affected systems
3 Details
4 Results
5 Solution
6 Reproducing
7 Vendor status
8 References
9 Disclaimer
10 Contact
1 Summary
A Man in the middle attacker can cause network
flood and denial of the service usage by sending
2 TCP packets per connection.
2 AFFECTED SYSTEMS
This vulnerability is tested against following platforms
and they are vulnerable.
Linux kern-v2.4.x
Microsoft Windows 2000 Server
Microsoft Windows 2000 Workstation
Microsoft Windows ME
Microsoft Windows 98
possibly other platforms are vulnerable.
Pending platform reports.
3 DETAILS
It is possible for an attacker to open ethernet
at promiscious mode and monitor network activity
to collect SEQ and ACK's numbers of an active TCP
connections.
An attacker can trigger an ACK loop by sending a
'spoofed' TCP packet with enabled ACK + FIN flags
to source host and destination host of an active
connection.
TCP Stacks of client and server will acknowledge
that the opposite side of the connection wants
to close the connection. And hosts will immedately
send ACK packets to complete the sequence.
The vulnerability exploits at this point.
Figure A :
TCP A MIM TCP B
1.ESTABLISHED ESTABLISHED
2.. <-- [CTL=ACK+FIN]
3. [CTL=ACK+FIN] -->
4.CLOSE-WAIT --> <CTL=ACK> --> CLOSE-WAIT
5.CLOSE-WAIT <-- <CTL=ACK> <-- CLOSE-WAIT
..
..
1500.CLOSE-WAIT --> <CTL=ACK> --> CLOSE-WAIT
1501.CLOSE-WAIT <-- <CTL=ACK> <-- CLOSE-WAIT
..
..
4 RESULTS
Result of this attack is continious loop of ACK packet
traffic between client and server.After tranmitting
MANY packets using maximum throughput , target
connection will be lost. At this period client
software and target service may lockup ,freeze or
crash.
Number of transmitted packets and the generated
traffic depends on host locations.
Attack becomes more effective if it is used against
local connections such as local netbios/cifs traffic.
if an attacker applies above scenario on an avarage
network,every connection attempt from any host to
any server will fail , the network transport will
be saturated in a short time , the collusion
rates will raise to extreme levels and the cpu
consuming of computers which is connected to
network are increased up to %90 due to the
packet traffic.
5 SOLUTION
Workaround
none
6 HOW TO REPRODUCE VULNERABILITY
Vulnerability can be reporduced by using atached win32 binary.
Download the zip file and follow the steps at the readme.txt
http://195.244.37.241/mimsc.zip
7 VENDOR STATUS
Microsoft corp. is Informed at 07/30/2001 , no response received.
8 REFERENCES
RFC 761, Page 35+
RFC 793
ACK Storm http://www.insecure.org/stf/iphijack.txt (see for Similar
results)
9 DISCLAIMER
Korhan Kaya is not responsible for the misuse or illegal use of
any of the information and/or the software listed on this
security advisory.
This text may be redistributed freely after the
release date given at the top of the text, provided that
redistributed copies are complete and unmodified.
10 CONTACT
Please send suggestions, updates, and comments to:
kkaya () priority1world com
Current thread:
- MiM Simultaneous close attack Korhan Kaya (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: MiM Simultaneous close attack Malcolm Jack (Aug 17)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Xyntrix (Aug 17)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack jaywhy (Aug 17)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Michael J. Cannon (Aug 17)
- RE: MiM Simultaneous close attack David Schwartz (Aug 17)
- RE: MiM Simultaneous close attack Dom De Vitto (Aug 17)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Korhan Kaya (Aug 17)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Xyntrix (Aug 17)
- RE: MiM Simultaneous close attack big bon (Aug 17)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Paul (Aug 18)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Robert Freeman (Aug 18)
- Re: MiM Simultaneous close attack Paul (Aug 18)
(Thread continues...)
