Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer
From: gregory duchemin <c3rb3r () HOTMAIL COM>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:33:47 -0000
hi, i noticed and have reported the same flaw on november 8 2000 on vuln-dev below the original mail i sent. Gregory ============== hi, I dunno if this one was previously reported, when entering an url with more than 280 chars, MSIE 5.00.2314.1003 crash with a dr watson because of an access violation. for example: http://ip/$$$$$.....$$$$$$$ (about 280) will crash with bad access to address 0x24 0x24 0x24 0x24 (0x24 = ascii $) it would be easy to insert win32 code inside the URI and force remote browser to execute it. note: this happened on NT 4.00.1381 server Gregory Duchemin NEUROCOM CANADA
From: Rio Martin <root () VBME NET>
Reply-To: root () VBME NET
To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:45:51 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [66.38.151.7] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBC49A3AB003340043189422697079E3B0; Tue Feb 06 12:04:00 2001
Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com
[66.38.151.7])by lists.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid
012C024D521; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:38:30 -0700 (MST)
Received: from LISTS.SECURITYFOCUS.COM by LISTS.SECURITYFOCUS.COM
(LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 24988959 for
VULN-DEV () LISTS SECURITYFOCUS COM; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:38:03 -0700
Received: from securityfocus.com (mail.securityfocus.com [66.38.151.9]) by
lists.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F11D224C494 for
<vuln-dev () lists securityfocus com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:28:07 -0700
(MST)
Received: (qmail 26817 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2001 14:28:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 26814 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2001 14:28:15 -0000
Received: from c001-h008.c001.snv.cp.net (HELO c001.snv.cp.net)
(209.228.32.122) by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2001
14:28:15 -0000
Received: (cpmta 15475 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2001 06:30:59 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO fastnet02) (203.130.200.104) by smtp.vbme.net
(209.228.32.122) with SMTP; 6 Feb 2001 06:30:59 -0800
From owner-vuln-dev () SECURITYFOCUS COM Tue Feb 06 12:05:16 2001
Approved-By: BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM
Delivered-To: vuln-dev () lists securityfocus com
Delivered-To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM
X-Sent: 6 Feb 2001 14:30:59 GMT
References: <200102051812.KAA19345 () user7 hushmail com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Message-ID: <000f01c09049$e93d60a0$6600a8c0@fastnet02>
Sender: VULN-DEV List <VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM>
Well, i found it after my computer used by my friend about three - four
weeks ago. I am running IE5.0 SP1, Windows 98 2nd Ed. Dont know what he ve
done with my computer but I also found that there is a long "A" file in my
C:\
Rio Martin.
www.rio-martin.com
_
<joetesta () HUSHMAIL COM> wrote:
| Rio Martin wrote:
|
| > Sorry,
| > But I think this one is already known and quite old ...
| >
| > Rio Martin.
| > www.rio-martin.com
|
| Even if it is already known and quite old, my machine remains vulnerable
| although I've applied all patches.
|
| So far, no one has been able to reproduce this buffer overflow. Could
| any particular person out there experienced with analyzing Internet
| Explorer help? (Ahem... Georgi...) =]
|
| - Joe Testa
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Current thread:
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer, (continued)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer William N. Zanatta (Feb 05)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Eric D. Williams (Feb 05)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Bojan Zdrnja (Feb 06)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Benjamin Branch (Feb 06)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Mike Sues (Feb 07)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Bojan Zdrnja (Feb 06)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Costa, Andrew (Feb 05)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Mike Duncan (Feb 05)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Arturo Busleiman (Feb 05)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer joetesta (Feb 05)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Rio Martin (Feb 06)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer gregory duchemin (Feb 06)
- Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer Lucien Fransman (Feb 07)
