Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Positive uses for rootkits
From: Daniel McCranie <sfml () SNEAKERNETSECURITY COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:58:31 -0600
Hi, I was wondering that since intruders can modify system commands to not display certain things, couldn't admins modified the commands like cp, mv, rm... so that they would not be able to replace any of the included commands? These could be made in such a way only to work unlimited in single user mode or have the disk mounted to another system when there is a legitimate need to change one. I have just enough UNIX knowledge to be dangerous to myself so be gentle :) Questions: 1. Are most rootkits simply shell scripts or real programs? 2. Would there be anyway to stop programs from overwriting those files with programming calls? (Maybe making them read-only and modifying chmod...) 3,4,5: I know that this probably wouldn't be good in a standard distro but what about a hardening kit? Has this been tried before? Is there something blatantly wrong? Dan
Current thread:
- Positive uses for rootkits Daniel McCranie (Mar 22)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Nicolas Gregoire (Mar 23)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Chih hung Feng (Mar 23)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Berend De Schouwer (Mar 23)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Gregor Binder (Mar 23)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Cedric Blancher (Mar 23)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Jason Nicholls (Mar 23)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Jonathan James (Mar 25)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Dick Visser (Mar 25)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Ron DuFresne (Mar 25)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Daniel R. Warner (Mar 25)
- Re: Positive uses for rootkits Dick Visser (Mar 25)
(Thread continues...)
