Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

RE: PHP Disclosure issue


From: PJD () portcullis-security com
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:40:16 +0100

I guess my point has been missed. Many applications/systems have options
such as debug mode, verbose or php_info(), all of which are invaluable
during development/debugging. Whilst I am not saying these are
vulnerabilities, I am saying that these should not be left on in
production environments as they often disclose unnecessary or important
information. The difference being that whilst this is not a directly
exploitable vulnerability, it discloses information specific to the
system that allows a more focused approach which could lead to the
system being exploited. 

Further to all of this I do not believe that the developers are
responsible as they have clearly stated in their response that it is
documented, hence my point about the administrator rather than the
developer. Finally, the use of errors to produce vulnerabilities is well
known and well documented, even as far back as Bletchley Park and the
Enigma, some of Turin's theorys and in fact the basis for Colossus was
on the processing of errors.

Cheers
----------
From:         Kevin J. Menard, Jr.[SMTP:kmenard () WPI EDU]
Reply To:     Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
Sent:         Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:36 PM
To:   vuln-dev () securityfocus com
Subject:      Re: PHP Disclosure issue

Would you then consider the php_info() function to be a security flaw?
I don't
consider this to be a vulnerability discovered.  Anyone who's
developed with
language knows what kind of information is spit out on errors.

----- Original Message -----
From: <PJD () portcullis-security com>
To: <PEN-TEST () securityfocus com>; <VULN-DEV () securityfocus com>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 11:24 PM
Subject: PHP Disclosure issue


Hi guys

Recently we discovered a path disclosure vulnerability in PHP3.

This issue has been discussed with the vendor, and further to this
I
have included some of the comments made by them within this mail.

[Excerpt from mail to vendor]

On NT 4 Server with SP5 installed, running IIS4 with PHP 3 it
possible
to request a nonexistent file and the response is an error which
returns the wwwroot e.g.  requesting the following in the browser
-

Exploit example:

http://www.somewhere.com/notthere.php3 returns the following error
in
the browser window -

Unable to open c:\<wwwroot\notthere.php3 in - on line 0 No Input
file
specified

Having discussed this with the vendor, they have responded saying
that
this is a configuration error, and is simply rectified by changing
a
setting from the default  within the configuration .ini file.

[Snippit from the response]

"I don't consider this as a security flaw;  The distributed
php.ini-dist includes the following information (for a few months,
if
not  years):

display_errors  =   On  ; Print out errors (as a part of the
output) ;
For production web sites, you're strongly
encouraged; to turn this feature off, and use error logging
instead
(see below).; Keeping display_errors enabled on a production  web
site
may reveal; security information to end users, such as file paths
on
your Web server, your database schema or other  information

The fact that the full error information that helps you fix the
problem is not a flaw, and is not going to change.  PHP comes out
of
the box for development-oriented audience;  You have to configure
it
slightly
differently when you turn into production."

[End]

We see this as akin to the .idq type issue in IIS. Additionally,
as
all errors are returned to the browser it could be possible to use
PHP3 to generate further errors that could output information on
other
web resourses within that environment.

This discovery was made by John Clayton, from here at Portcullis.

Regards

Paul Docherty











 

-- 
 Kevin




Current thread: