Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: pine overflow
From: "Kurt Seifried" <bugtraq () seifried org>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:35:35 -0700
Stupid question: Is there even a small chance of it being exploitable ?
Based on pine's previous track record: yes. A short list (there is more): http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1998-09.html http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/slackware_advisory-1801.html http://www.washington.edu/pine/changes/4.30-to-4.31.html changelog entry: Fixed a few buffer overflow possibilities grep the changelog for "buffer overflow". Yoikes.
[]s -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br
Kurt Seifried, kurt () seifried org A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574 http://seifried.org/security/ http://www.idefense.com/digest.html
Current thread:
- pine overflow Andrei Tudorache (Feb 21)
- Re: pine overflow Jose Nazario (Feb 21)
- Re: pine overflow Rodrigo Barbosa (Feb 23)
- Re: pine overflow Kurt Seifried (Feb 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: pine overflow Wodahs Latigid (Feb 22)
- Re: pine overflow Wodahs Latigid (Feb 22)
