Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Decision
From: Mike Caudill <mcaudill () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 22:59:44 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello, I have run into a hard decision - i just dicovered a bug in <someserver> which <some large company> runs and is only accessible to the clients of <the company> - it's an auth server, somewhere tied together with Cisco router w/ SSG and RADIUS authentication. Due to bug, any source file can be read and the <the company> has spent thousands of $ for making the system. Whats the best - report the bug and possible workarounds or let it stay? What i am nervous of is that the <the company> could 'kick' me later for seeing the sources. P.Krumins
Peter,
CERT/CC has a checkbox on their vulnerability reporting form to keep the
reporter's information confidential from the affected vendors. See their
form at
http://www.cert.org/reporting/vulnerability_form.txt
If you dont feel comfortable going to the affected vendors directly, there
is always the option of using a trusted 3rd party like CERT/CC and having
them contact the vendors on your behalf.
- -Mike-
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| || || | Mike Caudill | mcaudill () cisco com |
| || || | PSIRT Incident Manager | 919.392.2855 |
| |||| |||| | DSS PGP: 0xEBBD5271 | 919.522.4931 (cell)|
| ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. | RSA PGP: 0xF482F607 ---------------------|
| C i s c o S y s t e m s | http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt |
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.2
iQA/AwUBPuADjopjyUnrvVJxEQJX7ACg80UaFE2pRCF1gbBRzRKg/cilPeQAoLdP
fekIMRYxavhJDJd4WyBlVl6M
=tp+w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Decision Peteris Krumins (Jun 05)
- Re: Decision Zow (Jun 05)
- Re: Decision Daan van de Linde (Jun 05)
- Re: Decision Mike Caudill (Jun 06)
