Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: bitmask handling in wireshark
From: Dirk Jagdmann <doj () cubic org>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:58:57 -0800
#define MYPROTO_FLAG_SAMPLING 0xf0
A better name would be #define MYPROTO_MASK_SAMPLING 0xf0 since it is a bitmask you're defining here. -- ---> Dirk Jagdmann ----> http://cubic.org/~doj -----> http://llg.cubic.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- bitmask handling in wireshark Andrei Emeltchenko (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Christopher Maynard (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Andreas (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Christopher Maynard (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Andreas (Dec 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Ed Beroset (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Andrei Emeltchenko (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Dirk Jagdmann (Dec 29)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Ed Beroset (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Andreas (Dec 28)
- Re: bitmask handling in wireshark Christopher Maynard (Dec 28)
