Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 31774: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-clnp.c packet-p_mul.c packet-tcp.c packet-x25.c

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Feb 2, 2010, at 2:32 PM, stig () wireshark org wrote:

> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=31774
>
> User: stig
> Date: 2010/02/02 02:32 PM
>
> Log:
> Added protocol name to "Reassembled length" text.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
>  Changes    Path              Action
>  +1 -1      packet-clnp.c     Modified
>  +1 -1      packet-p_mul.c    Modified
>  +1 -1      packet-tcp.c      Modified
>  +1 -1      packet-x25.c      Modified

NDS's "Reassembled length" field is in generated code; the generator is tools/ncp2222.py.  I've updated that.

Should the field names be "{proto}.reassembled.length", or "{proto}.reassembled_length"?  Do we expect to have other 
fields with information associated with the reassembly?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe