Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Dissector bug
From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard () GTECH COM>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:07:39 -0500
You have some duplicates being registered.
grep "hf_" packet-dash.c | grep "static" | grep "\-1" | wc
132 660 4872
grep "{&hf" packet-dash.c | wc
142 142 3228
Looks like these are your culprits:
hf_description
hf_episode_title
hf_episode_title_len
hf_has_media
hf_is_free_of_ca
hf_is_ippv
hf_is_oppv
hf_is_sub
hf_name
hf_name_len
- Chris
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Rach, Darshan
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 7:43 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug
I am still unable to solve this issue.
I get the error immediately after executing this piece of code:
reserved = ((tvb_get_guint8(tvb, packet_field_offset) & 0xc0) >> 6);
proto_tree_add_uint(oqtp_tree, hf_reserved, tvb, packet_field_offset, 1,
reserved);
Line 1490 in the attached packet dissector code file.
Your inputs would help me a lot J
+Darshan
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Jan Gerbecks
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 4:31 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector bug
Hi,
that usually means you forget to either:
initialize a variable
or didn't add it to the hf[] or ett[] array.
Take a closer look there,
Jan
On 08.01.2010, at 07:09, Rach, Darshan wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the following error:
[Dissector bug, protocol DASH: proto.c:2457: failed assertion
"(guint)hfindex < gpa_hfinfo.len"]
My code looks like this:
static gint hf_epg_info_bits_len = -1;
{&hf_epg_info_bits_len,
{"EPG Info Bits Length","oqtp.epg_info_bits_len",FT_UINT8,
BASE_DEC,NULL, 0x0,
"EPG Info Bits Length", HFILL}},
epg_info_bits_len = ((tvb_get_guint8(next_tvb, packet_field_offset)) &
0xf);
proto_tree_add_uint(sub_tree, hf_epg_info_bits_len, next_tvb,
packet_field_offset, 1, epg_info_bits_len);
packet_field_offset += 1;
Kindly help.
+Darshan
________________________________
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
postmaster () nds com and delete it from your system as well as any copies.
The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS
for employment and security purposes.
To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless
necessary.
An NDS Group Limited company. www.nds.com
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
________________________________
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
postmaster () nds com and delete it from your system as well as any copies.
The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS
for employment and security purposes.
To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless
necessary.
An NDS Group Limited company. www.nds.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Dissector bug Rach, Darshan (Jan 07)
- Re: Dissector bug Jan Gerbecks (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Rach, Darshan (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Rach, Darshan (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Maynard, Chris (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Joerg Mayer (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Maynard, Chris (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug philippe alarcon (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Maynard, Chris (Jan 09)
- Re: Dissector bug Stephen Fisher (Jan 12)
- Re: Dissector bug Maynard, Chris (Jan 08)
- Re: Dissector bug Jan Gerbecks (Jan 08)
