Wireshark mailing list archives
Move from C89 to C99?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:03:23 +0100
Hello,
with Wireshark being more than 10 years old and e.g. requiring glib2/gtk2,
maybe it would be OK to move the coding requirements from C89 to C99.
This would give us // comments, inline keywords and the like.
What do you think?
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Move from C89 to C99? Joerg Mayer (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Guy Harris (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Andrew Hood (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Joerg Mayer (Jan 19)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Gerald Combs (Jan 19)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Andrew Hood (Jan 18)
- Re: Move from C89 to C99? Guy Harris (Jan 18)
