Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Custom formatter for 64bit field
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:38:05 -0800
On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:24 PM, David Arnold wrote:
I'm writing a dissector for a protocol that uses a 64-bit time field which is not in the format required for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME.
What do you mean by "the format required for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME"? An FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME field doesn't have to be in the
form of seconds/nanoseconds in the packet (there's no support for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME in proto_tree_add_item()), it just
has to be possible to convert the value, in whatever form it is in the packet, into a
seconds-since-January-1-1970-midnight-UTC value and a nanoseconds-since-that-second value; is it possible to convert
the time field into such a value?
(If it's an FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME field, it must represent a particular date and time, and thus the only reason why it
couldn't be converted would be that:
1) it's local time, not UTC - but we handle fields of that sort by assuming, for better or worse, that they're
local time in the current time zone;
2) it represents a time outside the range representable by seconds-since-January-1-1970-midnight-UTC with a
32-bit time_t;
3) it needs resolution better than 1 nanosecond.)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Custom formatter for 64bit field David Arnold (Mar 11)
- Re: Custom formatter for 64bit field Guy Harris (Mar 11)
- Re: Custom formatter for 64bit field Maynard, Chris (Mar 11)
