Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: SVN version number in the documentation?
From: Andrew Hood <ajhood () fl net au>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:56:32 +1000
Guy Harris wrote:
I suspect their problem was that they didn't have Subversion installed on the build machine, so there was no svnversion command available
If you are building from a SVN/CVS tree you should be expected to have the tools on the build machine.
The User's Guide says "36497 for Wireshark 1.5"; should we do as we do for the programs, and not bother giving the SVN version number if you're not building from SVN?
I prefer to always have the SVN/CVS/etc revision or tag embedded as a
reference to exactly what version I'm looking at.
Andrew
--
There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
-- Dr. Who
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- SVN version number in the documentation? Guy Harris (Apr 06)
- Re: SVN version number in the documentation? Andrew Hood (Apr 06)
- Re: SVN version number in the documentation? Guy Harris (Apr 06)
- Re: SVN version number in the documentation? Andrew Hood (Apr 06)
