Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Diameter [Malformed Packet: GTPv2]
From: Bo Xu <xubo.leo () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:50:11 +0800
Hi ,
The unknown vendor id seems not the reason , because this packet which has
the 81000 vendor , but there is no
prompt of "Malformed Packet: GTPv2". I also attached the file .
I also have tried added all the information in the dictionary.xml ,
nothing is changed .
Diameter Protocol
Version: 0x01
Length: 532
Flags: 0x80
Command Code: 272 Credit-Control
ApplicationId: 4
Hop-by-Hop Identifier: 0xa4481500
End-to-End Identifier: 0x56b6802f
[Answer In: 31]
AVP: Session-Id(263) l=61 f=--- val=shcin.chinatelecom.com
;1310710240;231738395;14832:168
AVP: Origin-Host(264) l=30 f=--- val=shcin.chinatelecom.com
AVP: Origin-Realm(296) l=24 f=--- val=chinatelecom.com
AVP: Destination-Realm(283) l=24 f=--- val=chinatelecom.com
AVP: Auth-Application-Id(258) l=12 f=--- val=Diameter Credit Control (4)
AVP: Service-Context-Id(461) l=36 f=--- val=version1.in () chinatelecom com
AVP: CC-Request-Type(416) l=12 f=--- val=INITIAL_REQUEST (1)
AVP: CC-Request-Number(415) l=12 f=--- val=0
AVP: Event-Timestamp(55) l=12 f=--- val=Jul 15, 2011 06:25:08.000000000
UTC
AVP: Subscription-Id(443) l=44 f=---
AVP: Service-Information(873) l=240 f=V-- vnd=TGPP
AVP Code: 873 Service-Information
AVP Flags: 0x80
AVP Length: 240
AVP Vendor Id: 3GPP (10415)
Service-Information:
00004f4c800000e400013c6800004f708000001900013c68...
AVP: Unknown(20300) l=228 f=V-- vnd=81000
val=00004f708000001900013c68383631353030303937393833...
AVP Code: 20300 Unknown
AVP Flags: 0x80
AVP Length: 228
AVP Vendor Id: Unknown (81000)
Value: 00004f708000001900013c68383631353030303937393833...
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>wrote:
Bo Xu skrev 2011-08-25 18:21:
Hello guys ,
I am very confused that I got "Malformed Packet: GTPv2" in every
Diameter (CCR) in version 1.6 .
I tried multiple versions of wireshark , I have found that for the same
err_sample.pcap which I have already attached , there is
no such annoying prompt in version 1.2.16 . I read the WireShark
manual , there is some explanation in this URL.
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/AppMessages.html#id622336.
To my understanding , mostly there is something wrong in the packet
content . Another proof is that other diameter packet is working
perfectly with wireshark 1.6.1 version .
Here comes my question : does this AVP(20600) finally caused the
"malformed packet" prompt because there is no data in this AVP?
Or is there anything wrong with the CCR packet content ?
FYI : Diameter Server Port is 6555 , and this server connects the
multiple clients.
Service-Information:
00005078c000000c00013c680000036ac000001c000028af...
AVP: Unknown(20600) l=12 f=VM- vnd=81000
AVP Code: 20600 Unknown
AVP Flags: 0xc0
AVP Length: 12
AVP Vendor Id: Unknown (81000)
[No data]
[Expert Info (Warn/Undecoded): Data is empty]
[Message: Data is empty]
[Severity level: Warn]
[Group: Undecoded]
AVP: PS-Information(874) l=28 f=VM- vnd=TGPP
[Malformed Packet: GTPv2]
[Expert Info (Error/Malformed): Malformed Packet (Exception occurred)]
[Message: Malformed Packet (Exception occurred)]
[Severity level: Error]
[Group: Malformed]
BR
Xu Bo
Hi,
Some background, Wireshark dissects Diameter AVP with the help of xml files
they can be found in the
diameter directorry. For some AVP:s there is also C code to further dissect
"Octet Strings" packet-diameter_3gpp.c.
AVP 20600 with vendor id 81000 is not known to Wireshark, BTW the vendor id
should be registered in which case Wireshark would show the vendor. There is
no problem with the dissection of this AVP as far as I can tell.
AVP 22 vendor 3GPP "3GPP-User-Location-Info" is specified as Octet String
and
/*
* TS 29.061 v9.2.0
* 16.4.7.2 Coding 3GPP Vendor-Specific RADIUS attributes
*
* For P-GW, the Geographic Location Type values and coding are defined as
follows:
*
* 0 CGI
* 1 SAI
* 2 RAI
* 3-127 Spare for future use
* 128 TAI
* 129 ECGI
* 130 TAI and ECGI
* 131-255 Spare for future use
*/
This dissection fails as the content seems no to be correct according to
the spec.
Best regards
Anders
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe <wireshark-users-request ()
wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
voice_sample.zip
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Diameter [Malformed Packet: GTPv2] Bo Xu (Aug 25)
- Re: Diameter [Malformed Packet: GTPv2] Anders Broman (Aug 25)
- Re: Diameter [Malformed Packet: GTPv2] Bo Xu (Aug 25)
- Re: Diameter [Malformed Packet: GTPv2] Anders Broman (Aug 25)
