Re: New GCC, new option required?

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

Hi Bill,

That option sounds good to me. 

Thanks,
Jaap

Send from my iPhone

On 13 jul. 2011, at 16:47, Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com> wrote:

> > Re:
> >
> > > AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-unused-but-set-variable)
> >
> > Is there a (reasionably easy) way to use this option only when compiling
> > in the .../dissectors directory ?
> >
> > (I think that I've previously addressed the "unused_but_set" warnings
> > for many (all ?) of the other directories). (SVN 37600 & following...)
>
> PS: I've been using
>
> AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable)
>
> so that "unused-but-set-variable" is reported but treated as a warning
> instead of an error.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe