Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks

From: Chris Maynard <chris.maynard () gtech com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:47:06 +0000 (UTC)

Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@...> writes:

Is there a better way?  Or better yet, a proper solution?


Not claiming this is better or proper, just another alternative:

epan/strutil.c:

#include <string.h>
size_t ws_strlen(const char *s)
{
    if (s == NULL)
        return 0;
    return strlen(s);
}



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Chris Maynard (May 16)
  - Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Gerald Combs (May 16)
  - Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
- Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jakub Zawadzki (May 16)
  - Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 16)
    - Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Guy Harris (May 16)
    - Re: strlen() and NULL pointer checks Jeff Morriss (May 17)