Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: (no subject)
From: ankit <ankitha () cdac in>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:26:20 +0530
Hi Thank you fro your suggestion. I have solved the problem. The problem was in the FIELDDISPLAY part of the definition of &hf_event_link_detect. It is defined as 1 but is to be put as 32 ie the size of &hf_event_list. Thanks & Regards Ankith On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 19:29 +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
Hi Ankitha,
What the value of event_fields ?
Do you have look other dissector use proto_tree_add_bitmask ?
(packet-gsm_sim.c or packet-ieee80211.c )
Regards,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:50 PM, <ankitha () cdac in> wrote:
Hi
I am currently working on developing of MIH protocol plugin.
I am
using proto_tree_add_bitmask and getting the error in the
packets as -
17:55:33 Warn Dissector bug, protocol MIH, in packet
8:
proto.c:7166: failed assertion "len * 8 == hf->display"
What may be the error?
The following is the definition of the datatype where the
error occurs-
{
&hf_event_link_detect,
{
"MIH LINK Detected",
"mih.event_list.link_detect",
FT_BOOLEAN,
1,
NULL,
LINK_DETECT_MASK,
NULL, HFILL
}
}
and the call to the function is like this-
evt_list_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(tlv_tree,
ett_event_bitmap);
proto_tree_add_bitmask(evt_list_tree, tvb, offset,
hf_event_list,
ett_event_bitmap, event_fields, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
-->hf_event_list is defined this way-
{
&hf_event_list,
{
"List of Events",
"mih.event_list",
FT_UINT32,
BASE_HEX,
NULL,
0x0,
NULL, HFILL
}
},
Let me know if any extra info is required.
NB:I am sorry for duplicating the mail, but the problem is a
little
urgent.
Regards
Ankith
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list
<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- (no subject) ankitha (Mar 21)
- Re: (no subject) Alexis La Goutte (Mar 21)
- Re: (no subject) ankit (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- (no subject) Shikha . (Mar 28)
- Re: (no subject) Alexis La Goutte (Mar 21)
