Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:50:49 -0800
(Subject line changed to match what you presumably intended.) On Feb 9, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
This just occurred to me as I was reading an article on GCC (which has recently migrated to using a C++ compiler, despite still being mostly written in C). I haven't given it a great deal of thought yet, but I figured I'd bring it up and see what general opinion was. At a first glance, building Wireshark with C++ compilers would give us two major benefits:
...
- Built-in exceptions. This would be additional migration work, but it would permit us to drop a non-trivial amount of code that we currently own in order to do our own exceptions. Note that I'm not suggesting we start writing Wireshark in C++ (that's an entirely different debate), but that we could compile using C++ compilers, and then potentially sneak in a few C++ constructs where we used to roll our own.
Presumably by "start writing Wireshark in C++" you mean "rearchitecting Wireshark as a C++ program", as once you've
snuck in one C++ construct you're writing in C++. :-)
Note that some of Wireshark, i.e. the Qt GUI part, is already written in C++, and at least one third-party Wireshark
plugin, i.e. the WSGD packet description language plugin:
http://wsgd.free.fr
is written in C++.
See also
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/User+Group+rs-osug/evan-adams
The Old Man and the C
Evan Adams
Sun Microsystems
Abstract
"You can't teach an old dog new tricks" goes the old proverb. This is a story about a pack of old dogs (C programmers)
and their odyssey of trying to learn new tricks (C++ programming).
C++ is a large, complex language which can easily be abused, but also includes many features to help programmers more
quickly write higher quality code. The TeamWare group consciously decided which C++ features to use and, just as
importantly, which features not to use. We also incrementally adopted those features we chose to use. This resulted in
a successful C++ experience.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Idle Though - Compiling with C++ Evan Huus (Feb 09)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Guy Harris (Feb 09)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Evan Huus (Feb 09)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Donald White (Feb 09)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Ed Beroset (Feb 10)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Evan Huus (Feb 10)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Dirk Jagdmann (Feb 11)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Richard Stearn (Feb 11)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Evan Huus (Feb 11)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Jakub Zawadzki (Feb 11)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Jaap Keuter (Feb 12)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Gerald Combs (Feb 12)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Evan Huus (Feb 09)
- Re: Idle Thought - Compiling with C++ Guy Harris (Feb 09)
