Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet
From: Christopher Smith <Christopher.Smith () au gt com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 02:21:08 +0000
Sorry for my sorry terminology, responding … On Dec 8, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Christopher Smith <Christopher.Smith () au gt com<mailto:Christopher.Smith () au gt com>> wrote:
Honestly, was hoping to export “just” SMB to CSV so our Pivot Table guru can mash it up to their hearts content. If I filter only SMB, their run will not include all the traffic – just tail frames.
What is a "tail frame"?
If you filter only SMB, you will see all *SMB* traffic. If a given SMB packet is in multiple link-layer frames, only
the last frame will show up if you filter with "smb". Is that what you're talking about?
Yes
And "export to CSV" really means "export {particular set of items} to CSV"; what are the particular items you want to
export? Do you want one line of CSV for each SMB request or response? Are you *just* analyzing at the SMB layer, so
that you only want information about the SMB request or response, and don't care about the individual link-layer frames
that make it up? Or do you need to know the lower-level details about the TCP segments and IP datagrams (if
SMB-over-TCP or SMB-over-NetBIOS-over-TCP) and link-layer frames that contribute to each SMB request or response?
Note that a single TCP segment can contain *multiple* SMB requests or responses; this adds an additional layer of
complexity, and one that a filter of "smb" won't help - that's not reassembly, however, that's *dis*assembly. A true
"show me a view at the protocol XXX layer" would, for SMB, show a line in the summary for each SMB request or response,
even if that means two lines for a given link-layer frame or if it means one line for multiple link-layer frames or
*both* (consider a TCP segment that contains the first part of one request or response, followed by another segment
that contains the rest of that request or response and all or part of a *subsequent* request or response).
We’re getting there ☺ I would expect the complexity you have described (2 for 1, 1 for multi, or both) and would be
grateful to see that, as a massaged trace. I think in the end game, it would be some sort of Export feature that
combines/amalgamates/merges frames into packets, packets into segments, then segements into protocol – and then dump
that into another trace. I would imagine – if I’m the only one asking this specifically – that this ultimately won’t
happen!
I won’t keep you – I have been grateful for your expertise, seriously! FWIW, I have found today TCP StreamGraph -->
Throughput Graph – which I believe would be the ultimate end of the Pivot guru’s first analysis, and so distributing.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Christopher
________________________________
'Grant Thornton' refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory
services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton Australia
Ltd is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide
partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL
does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate one another and
are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. In the Australian context only, the use of the term 'Grant
Thornton' may refer to Grant Thornton Australia Limited ABN 41 127 556 389 and its Australian subsidiaries and related
entities. GTIL is not an Australian related entity to Grant Thornton Australia Limited.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Liability is limited in those States
where a current scheme applies.
Registered Office, Level 30, 525 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000
DISCLAIMER
This email message and any related attachments are confidential and should only be read by those persons to whom they
were addressed. They may contain copyright, personal or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this email, any use, copying or disclosure of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Any confidentiality, privilege
or copyright is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you in error. Views expressed in this message
are the views of the sender and are not necessarily views of Grant Thornton, except where the message expressly states
otherwise. Any advice contained herein should be treated as preliminary advice only and subject to formal written
confirmation. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or any other defect which
may cause damage or loss, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus‐free. Grant Thornton
accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may occur as a result of the transmission of this email or its
attachments to the recipient.
________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 07)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Christopher Smith (Dec 08)
- Re: "Visually" re-assemble packet Guy Harris (Dec 08)
