Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Byte ordering for dissectors
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:21:21 +0100
Hi, On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:33:49PM +0100, Michal Labedzki wrote:
Probably PCAP/PCAPNG have ordering info by magic bytes, but I do not know how to do that while live capturing (current code work for this case)
Still magic numbers are always saved in current host endianess ;| So if you (re)save capture file in wireshark (e.g. after adding comment), it'll be no longer properly dissected.
Possible solutions: 1. Wireshark already support byte-ordering information for dissectors (anyone seen, anyone knows?)
In packet-nflog.c I'm trying to guess endianess (nflog_tvb_byte_order())
You probably can do the same, looking at dissect_linux_usb_pseudo_header()
I'm guessing that:
- usb_urb_ts_sec - I think you can assume that all time are smaller than 0xFFFFFFFF,
which for valid captures will be correct to about: 'Sun Feb 7 07:28:15 CET 2106',
- usb_urb_ts_usec must be < 1000000 (false detection only for 256 values),
- usb_status must be 0 or have high bit set (false detection only for -EPERM),
- usb_urb_len, usb_urb_data_len - must be some sane values (?).
Hope that helps,
Kuba.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Byte ordering for dissectors Michal Labedzki (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Jakub Zawadzki (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
