Re: Is this a bug in display filter engine or something I have done wrong?

[Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com
> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I have the following definition (someone else wrote this piece):
>
>    {&hf_ieee80211_ff_dmg_params_bss,
>      {"BSS Type", "wlan.dmg_params.bss",
>       FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC, VALS(bss_type), 0x03,
>       NULL, HFILL }},
>
> and am dissecting this for Probe Response frames depending on whether
> or not it is a DMG STA or not (based on the frequency of the STA:
> 70,000 MHz):
>
>   gboolean     *p_isDMG =
> ((gboolean*)(p_get_proto_data(wmem_file_scope(), pinfo, proto_wlan,
> IS_DMG_KEY)));
> ...
>   if (p_isDMG && *p_isDMG) {
>     add_ff_dmg_params(cap_tree, tvb, pinfo, offset);
> ...
>
> This displays correctly, but if we specify a display filter of
> wlan.dmg_params.bss == 1 nothing is found.
>
> What do I need to do here to make this work?
>
> Hi,

Or *p_isDMG is not initial for the first pass ?

Regards,

> --
> Regards,
> Richard Sharpe
> (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe