Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Small bug in Modbus dissector exception information
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 08:40:51 +0200
Hi Please report this in a bug-report on https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/ and attach a sample trace detailing the issue. regards Roland On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz () gmx net> wrote:
i use a "Live on the Bleeding Edge" Version https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win64/Wireshark-win64-2.3.0-128-g98e8b26.exe Sample Modbus-Exception-Code Response: 00 00 00 00 00 03 00 88 01 Modbus/TCP Transaction Identifier: 0 Protocol Identifier: 0 Length: 3 Unit Identifier: 0 Function 8: Diagnostics. Exception: Illegal function Function Code: Unknown (136) <-- !! the execption bit does not get masked here !! (136 & 0x7F) == 8 Exception Code: Illegal function (1) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Small bug in Modbus dissector exception information Dennis Luehring (Jul 29)
- Re: Small bug in Modbus dissector exception information Roland Knall (Jul 29)
- Re: Small bug in Modbus dissector exception information Dennis Luehring (Jul 30)
- Re: Small bug in Modbus dissector exception information Roland Knall (Jul 29)
