Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: wnpa-sec-2017-04 and 2.0.12
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:44:32 +0200
On 17 Apr 2017, at 18:14, Joshua Brown <jmbrown () tenable com> wrote: Greetings, The release notes for 2.0.12 ( https://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-2.0.12.html ) show that wnpa-sec-2017-04 is listed a fixed issue. However, that does not match with the content of the page for wnpa-sec-2017-04 ( https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2017-04.html ), which indicates the issue was fixed in versions 2.2.5 and 2.0.11 . Is this just a case of a simple typo on the 2.0.12 release notes page? Thanks!
Looking at the branches involved (see the comments in https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13347) it seems that the wnpa-sec-2017-04 advisory is a tad optimistic. I recon that the fix was indeed included in 2.0.12. Thanks, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- wnpa-sec-2017-04 and 2.0.12 Joshua Brown (Apr 18)
- Re: wnpa-sec-2017-04 and 2.0.12 Jaap Keuter (Apr 18)
