Wireshark mailing list archives
packet-rpc.c does not call an rpc sub-dissector when there are no parameters or there is no response
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:00:47 -0800
Hi folks,
In packet-rpc.c we see this:
/*
* Don't call any subdissector if we have no more date to dissect.
*/
if (tvb_reported_length_remaining(tvb, offset) == 0) {
return TRUE;
}
However, this is wrong, IMO.
One of the things that our dissector functions does is insert items
like "PROCNAME Reply" etc against the procedure etc, but I would also
like to add text like "void" for void parameters etc.
Indeed, dissection of the NULL procedure doesn't show much useful ...
Does anyone see a problem with changing it to call the sub-dissector
even when there is no more data to dissect?
I guess one possibility is that existing dissectors might fail :-)
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- packet-rpc.c does not call an rpc sub-dissector when there are no parameters or there is no response Richard Sharpe (Jan 12)
