Wireshark mailing list archives
size_t under Windows ...
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:12:51 -0800
Hi folks, especially Windows developers ...
I am running into problems with this in my latest build:
#if defined(_WIN32)
char * cap_pipe_buf; /**< Pointer
to the buffer we read into */
DWORD cap_pipe_bytes_to_read; /**< Used by
pipe_dispatch */
DWORD cap_pipe_bytes_read; /**< Used by
pipe_dispatch */
#else
size_t cap_pipe_bytes_to_read; /**< Used by
pipe_dispatch */
size_t cap_pipe_bytes_read; /**< Used by
pipe_dispatch */
#endif
I suspect that I should simply define both of those as size_t and get
rid of the Windows specific stuff.
Does any one else have an opinion?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- size_t under Windows ... Richard Sharpe (Nov 23)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Helge Kruse (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Dario Lombardo (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Roland Knall (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Graham Bloice (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Dario Lombardo (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Helge Kruse (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Richard Sharpe (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: size_t under Windows ... Richard Sharpe (Nov 24)
