Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol
From: Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:33:29 -0400
I would agree that a dissector table for the GUIDs is probably the best way to go. I also just created a GUID dissector 
table in my recent work with Netmon.  grep "netmon.provider_id" for example of how to setup a GUID dissector table 
(it's much more straightforward than the DCE/RPC one)
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Mon, Sep 18, 2017 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Best way to give configuration information to a protocol
Hi Juan Jose,
2017-09-18 17:12 GMT+02:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <juanjo () rti com>:
Hi all,
Which is the best way to pass configuration to a protocol? Do we have any builtin mechanisms? I tried to upload a patch 
using CSV at some point but it didn't succeed. So I wonder if there is any recommended way I can implement: table or 
list in the Preferences, XML file, CSV file...
My goal is to pass ("GUID", "plugin_name") pairs to the RTPS protocol so Wireshark knows dynamically what plugin it 
should call to deserialize data that is written by the DataWriter with id = "GUID". The GUID is part of the DATA packet 
and it is already dissected and known at that point.
A UAT dialog could be appropriate for your needs. Several dissectors are already using it and can be taken as an 
example (packet-ipsec.c, packet-http.c, ...).
Or if the GUID / plugin mapping never changes, you could create a dissector table and have your plugin register to this 
table (see register_dissector_table() / register_custom_dissector_table() and the corresponding dissector_add_XXX() 
functions).
Best regards,
Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list 
<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: 
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark 
org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Best way to give configuration information to a	protocol Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a	protocol Pascal Quantin (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa (Sep 18)
 - Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev (Sep 18)
- Re: Best way to give configuration information to a protocol Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa (Sep 19)
 
 
 
 - Re: Best way to give configuration information to a	protocol Pascal Quantin (Sep 18)
 
