Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Annoying deviances from the 802.11-2016 spec in the names of cipher suites
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:06:16 +0100
Hi Richard, See inline, On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:49 PM Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com> wrote:
Hi folks,
I notice that the names used in the code for the 802.11 dissector
deviate in annoying ways from IEEE 802.11-2016.
For example:
static const value_string ieee80211_rsn_cipher_vals[] = {
{0, "NONE"}, // Spec says: Use group cipher suite
{1, "WEP (40-bit)"}, // Spec says: WEP-40
{2, "TKIP"},
{3, "AES (OCB)"}, // Spec says: Reserved
Reserved (ex-AES(OCB))
{4, "AES (CCM)"}, // Spec says: GCMP-128
{5, "WEP (104-bit)"}, // Spec says: WEP-104
{6, "BIP (128)"}, // Spec says: BIP-CMAC-128
{7, "Group addressed traffic not allowed"},
{8, "GCMP (128)" }, // Spec says: GCMP-128
{9, "GCMP (256)" }, // Spec says: GCMP-256
{10, "CCMP (256)" }, // Spec says: CCMP-256
{11, "BIP (GMAC-128)" }, // Spec says: BIP-GMAC-128
{12, "BIP (GMAC-256)" }, // Spec says: BIP-GMAC-256
{13, "BIP (CMAC-256)" }, // Spec says: BIP-CMAC-256
{0, NULL}
};
I think we should conform to the spec as far as possible.
Does anyone have any objections to me fixing these?
No problem... there is a lot of other change needed...
-- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Annoying deviances from the 802.11-2016 spec in the names of cipher suites Richard Sharpe (Nov 29)
- Re: Annoying deviances from the 802.11-2016 spec in the names of cipher suites Graham Bloice (Nov 29)
- Re: Annoying deviances from the 802.11-2016 spec in the names of cipher suites Richard Sharpe (Nov 29)
- Re: Annoying deviances from the 802.11-2016 spec in the names of cipher suites Alexis La Goutte (Nov 29)
- Re: Annoying deviances from the 802.11-2016 spec in the names of cipher suites Graham Bloice (Nov 29)
