Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: GitLab migration update
From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:59:07 +0200
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:56 PM Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl> wrote:
It looks like you have to delete the old stale fork relationship first,
otherwise you will end up with a 409 Conflict error ("Project already
forked").
To automate fixing the fork status without requiring creation of an
access token, I wrote a small script that can be executed from your web
browser. See https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/16806
My wireshark repo on gitlab is not a fork of the main one (I've created it much earlier). Do you think the fork status can be forced on it as well? Just out of curiosity, I've already re-forked.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- GitLab migration update Gerald Combs (Aug 23)
- Re: GitLab migration update Guy Harris (Aug 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] GitLab migration update Gerald Combs (Aug 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-users] GitLab migration update Guy Harris (Aug 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-users] GitLab migration update Roland Knall (Aug 24)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] GitLab migration update Gerald Combs (Aug 23)
- Re: GitLab migration update Guy Harris (Aug 23)
- Re: GitLab migration update Uli Heilmeier (Aug 24)
- Re: GitLab migration update Peter Wu (Aug 25)
- Re: GitLab migration update Dario Lombardo (Aug 25)
- Re: GitLab migration update Roland Knall (Aug 26)
- Re: GitLab migration update Peter Wu (Aug 25)
