Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 10:17:21 -0700
On Mar 22, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen () lurchi franken de> wrote:
I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful. There were not very interested in defining a file format...
They've done so in the past:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1761 (and https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3827)
and, for non-capture-file formats:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8536#section-3
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Mario Rugiero (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Mar 22)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Tuexen (Mar 22)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Mar 25)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Tuexen (Mar 22)
