mailing list archives
Re: Opinion: Complete failure of Oracle security response and utter neglect of their responsibility to their customers
From: Rainer Duffner <rainer () ultra-secure de>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:17:49 +0200
David Litchfield wrote:
I know you this wasn't your intent when you wrote it, but:
That means 70 000 000 € spend by Larry for the silly Yacht - you,
David, could charge 100 000 per day and still deliver more value.
I just want to make it clear that all I'm looking for from Oracle is,
not a job to review their code, but to treat security properly and
give their customers the respect they paid for.
I'm sorry if it sounded that way - I'm also not jealous of Mr. Ellison's
riches (I've not directly contributed to them, mind you).
I just wanted to make the proportions visible ;-)
From my view, there is no doubt that you alone have done a great deal
of work to secure Oracle products - I assume with little financial
reward from Oracle itself.
This enforces the popular view that (most) big corporations don't
"value" something until it costs money - and if it costs a lot of money,
it must be of big value...
Sounds like a Dilbert-esque PHB'ism, but that's the impression I get.
Unless a whistleblower (image of Larry keelhauling him comes up...)
comes forward, only Ms. Davidson can shade some light on how exactly the
QA- and patch-creation process works and why it can take literally years
to put out a security-update (that turns out to be little less than a
placebo) to a currently shipped product.
Re: Opinion: Complete failure of Oracle security response and utter neglect of their responsibility to their customers Ivan . (Oct 07)