Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Ping Cyberkit 2.2
From: "GSimmonds" <gsimmonds () primus ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:03:09 -0400
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr Aldo Medina" <aldomedina () hotpop com> To: <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:12 PM Subject: Ping Cyberkit 2.2
Since about a week, my snort logs are full of messages like this:
Sep 6 12:27:56 linuxserver snort: [1:483:2] ICMP PING CyberKit 2.2
Windows [Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]: {ICMP}
200.95.132.194 -> 200.95.123.16
Running Linux Debian Woody. Should I be worried?
Not unless you are running win XP or 2K. There has been a lot of Nachi/Welchia worm activity lately. An infected host uses echo request to look for other hosts to infect. Followed by a TCP connection attempt to port 135 if it receives an echo reply. http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100559.htm Even if you are not using an MS os, dropping inbound ICMP Type 8 would at least prevent additional, useless inbound traffic. Unless you really need it. There is a good thread in the securityfocus firewalls archive. http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/129/334807/2003-08-19/2003-08-25/1 Thanks for your time. Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Captus Networks Are you prepared for the next Sobig & Blaster? - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans - Precisely Define and Implement Network Security - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic FIND OUT NOW - FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/42.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Ping Cyberkit 2.2 Dr Aldo Medina (Sep 12)
- Re: Ping Cyberkit 2.2 Karma (Sep 15)
- RE: Ping Cyberkit 2.2 Ian Kennedy (Sep 15)
- Re: Ping Cyberkit 2.2 GSimmonds (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Ping Cyberkit 2.2 Ryan Belcher (Sep 12)
- Re: Ping Cyberkit 2.2 Karma (Sep 15)
