Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity

From: Pranay Kanwar <warl0ck () metaeye org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:29:43 +0530

Agreed there is no real world downside, but the problem is if
you preach this, then people will misunderstand things
and concentrate more on the "secret layer" than making
sure their daemons are secure.

It always not about us but all of them :).

Regards

warl0ck // MSG
http://www.metaeye.org

Current thread:

Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity, (continued)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity work (Apr 04)
  - Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Daniel Miessler (Apr 05)
    - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Mark Sutton (Apr 09)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 05)
  - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Mandelcorn, Seymour (Apr 09)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Daniel Miessler (Apr 05)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity krymson (Apr 05)
  - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Ken Kousky (Apr 09)
    - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity John Rodriguez (Apr 09)
    - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Ken Kousky (Apr 10)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Pranay Kanwar (Apr 05)
- Re: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity levinson_k (Apr 09)
- Re: RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity levinson_k (Apr 09)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity krymson (Apr 10)
  - Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Joe Yong (Apr 11)
    - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Young, Randy (Apr 11)
    - RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Ken Kousky (Apr 11)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 10)
  - Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Daniel Miessler (Apr 11)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity jay.tomas (Apr 11)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 11)

(Thread continues...)