Re: Bilateral Relations.

[Tim Newsham <tim.newsham+dd () gmail com>]

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Yiorgos Adamopoulos
<yiorgos.adamopoulos () gmail com> wrote:
> Interesting. Geers's "Strategic Cyber Security" deal with the case of
> a Cyber Arms Control Treaty ( http://www.ccdcoe.org/278.html ) and
> more specifically compares it to the Chemical Weapons Convention. It
> puts a lot of convincing effort on why a Cyber Arms Convention is hard
> to succeed.

from the strategic cyber security web page:
"There are two primary reasons why IPv6 scores well in this research.
First, as a technology, IPv6 is more resistant to outside influence than
the other proposed strategies, particularly deterrence and arms
control, which should make it a more reliable investment. Second,
IPv6 addresses the most significant advantage of cyber attackers
today – anonymity."

Do you know what this is referring to?
In what ways is it expected that ipv6 will address anonymity?
Is there a particular IPv6 technology that the author anticipates will be
deployed with IPv6?

> http://gr.linkedin.com/in/yiorgos
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunityinc com
https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave