BreachExchange mailing list archives

Compliant does not equal protected: our false sense of security


From: Audrey McNeil <audrey () riskbasedsecurity com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:49:08 -0600

http://www.csoonline.com/article/2995924/data-protection/compliant-does-not-equal-protected-our-false-sense-of-security.html

It is no surprise that cybersecurity threats have risen to the top of the
list of concerns for IT staff and even members of the C-Suite. With each
new wave of breach incidents, lawmakers and regulators are exploring ways
to create new compliance requirements or enhancing existing ones.

The first half of October 2015 alone is proof of this. California Gov.
Jerry Brown signed three new cybersecurity bills into law setting specific
encryption standards, expanding the definition of personal information and
requiring breach notifications to contain certain language. And the highest
European Union court struck down the safe harbor provisions shared with the
United States that allowed the transfer of personal information of EU
citizens over such web sites as Google and Facebook.

Asking the average person on the street what are the first cybersecurity
rules that come to mind, and you will probably hear “HIPAA,” which is short
for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. As one
of the oldest and most clearly defined data security measures in the US,
this is certainly understandable. Probably not as well known is that it
took the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health
(HITECH) Act of 2009 to amend many HIPAA provisions and turn them into
among today’s leading models of privacy regulation.

Under HIPAA/HITECH jurisdiction, organizations are now required to prove
compliance in order to avoid both regulatory oversight and levied fines.
More importantly, healthcare providers are now required to affirmatively
and very publicly report breach incidents whenever authorized possessors of
protected health information lose control of such data.

Having regulatory compliance laws in place helps hold organizations
accountable and clearly places the onus on organizations to protect the
sensitive data they store. So, with regulatory compliance standards in
place, does this translate into healthcare organizations being better
protected than those in other industries? Not necessarily.

If anything, cybercriminals seem to be more motivated than ever. According
to a recent Ponemon Institute study, 91 percent of healthcare organizations
have suffered at least one data breach in the past two years. How can one
of the heaviest regulated industries for data breaches be such a constant
and fruitful target for attack?

Fulfilling regulatory checklists may vindicate you from government-issued
oversight and fines, but it does not exempt you from other recourse
including business disruption, lawsuits, reputation damage, or public
outrage. Compliant or non-compliant, these are all potential consequences
of a data breach. It’s important to remember that being compliant does not
mean your organization is safe, nor does it mean that your organization is
immune to repercussions at the hands of a data breach.

The danger with this line of thinking is that for many, compliance becomes
synonymous with protected. Understanding the difference will ensure that
compliance is not the end-goal and organizations must extend how they
protect themselves beyond these basic requirements.

Of course, regulatory compliance is an important practice and failure to
comply can result in significant consequences. We’ve seen numerous cases
where this form of corporate negligence has directly resulted in a data
breach. A common example is the loss or misplacement of an endpoint or
unencrypted data; this was the case with the high-profile Anthem case from
earlier this year. While these forms of breaches occur regularly, we often
ignore cases where organizations upheld compliance requirements and were
still victims of attack.

Compliance is and should be treated as a baseline standard; a minimum
requirement level we all need to fulfill in order to not have the book
thrown at us. Regulations like HIPAA/HITECH are important and valuable
measures to have in place; however, these kinds of one-size-fits-all
regulations should not be treated as comprehensive guidelines. This creates
a false sense of security.

As cyberattacks increasingly threaten both corporate and public well-being,
it’s critical that organizations be in control of their data. From
proactive monitoring and reporting, to detection and response procedures,
deploying a layered approach to security that extends beyond “good-enough”
protection is the most effective strategy to keep sensitive information
private and ultimately avoid legal and financial recourse.
_______________________________________________
Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () datalossdb org)
Archived at http://seclists.org/dataloss/
Unsubscribe at http://lists.osvdb.org/mailman/listinfo/dataloss
For inquiries regarding use or licensing of data, e-mail
        sales () riskbasedsecurity com 

Supporters:

Risk Based Security (http://www.riskbasedsecurity.com/)
YourCISO is an affordable SaaS solution that provides a comprehensive information security program that ensures focus 
on the right security.  If you need security help or want to provide real risk reduction for your clients contact us!

Current thread: