Re: DMZ Archtecture - Using public address space vs. using Private Ad dress space and NAT

[David Lang <david.lang () digitalinsight com>]

the only exception to what Chris is saying is if you have a strictly
internal network that by design should NEVER talk to the internet.

also note that never is a long time to be VERY sure before you go that
route.

David Lang

 On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Chris St. Clair wrote:

> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 02:11:36 +0000
> From: Chris St. Clair <chris_stclair () hotmail com>
> To: hausen () punkt de, bernard_stapleton () exchange au ml com
> Cc: firewall-wizards () nfr com, firewall-wizards () nfr com
> Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] DMZ Archtecture - Using public address space vs.
>     using Private Ad dress space and NAT
>
> For all the previously mentioned reasons, public vs. RCP1918
> is a tough decision. However, whatever you end up doing, do
> not, I repeat DO NOT use illegal address space - or address
> space that does belong to someone (or no one) but not you.
>
> You may laugh, and you may laugh hard at the thought of an
> organization that would do such a boneheaded thing. But believe
> it like you believe in gravity, it happens. And don't let anyone
> tell you it's a good idea. If they do, send 'em my way; I've got
> months worth of stories why you shouldn't do it.
>
> --chris
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards () nfr com
> http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () nfr com
http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards