Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4
From: Silvio Cesare <silvio () big net au>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:14:27 +1100
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800, Day Jay wrote:
So, by paying for a house or a job for spending one's time developing/finding exploits would be "bad"? Would it be better to be a homeless exploit coder?
How about some regular dev. work? I speak not for the script kiddiez with jobs who are cert'd in point and click security - they have obviously paid their dues. -- Silvio _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 sockz loves you (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 batz (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Silvio Cesare (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 yossarian (Jan 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Anonymous (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 sockz loves you (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Day Jay (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Silvio Cesare (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Day Jay (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Anonymous (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 The Hawklord (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 hellNbak (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Ron DuFresne (Jan 22)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 hellNbak (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 sockz loves you (Jan 21)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 Anonymous (Jan 21)
- Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 ratel (Jan 22)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny yossarian (Jan 22)
- Re: Security Industry Under Scrutiny #4 ratel (Jan 23)
