Morning Wood Poll

["David Sentelle" <David.Sentelle () cnbcbank com>]

I've already cast my vote, but I think a simple yes/no is not sufficient for the real solution.

The real solution is to have a fully open full-disclosure mailing list, only for full-disclosure.  People not 
disclosing vulnerabilities or bugs would be warned then banned on repeat offenses.  

To resolve the issue of ongoing correspondence regarding disclosures made on the full-disclosure list, there would be a 
full-disclosure-DISCUSSION list.  That would be the 'noise' list, that would contain 99% of what is currently in 
full-disclosure.

This post should go to the discussion list.  Many of Morning Wood's posts would hopefully go to the discussion list, 
with the disclosures he's made going to the full-disclosure list.

Would the addition of a discussion list, and the policy change for the full-disclosure list, really cramp anyone's 
freedom of speech or the value of the full-disclosure list?



This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error, you are 
prohibited from using, divulging any of its contents, or forwarding 
this email.  Please notify admin () cnbcbank com and delete it from 
your system.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html