RE: Morning Wood Poll

["Chris Peden" <cpeden () sundownerinteriors com>]

I know how to use my delete key, although protected, I did not like the
fact morning_wood deliberately sent a post with a virus....that to me is
very unprpofessional and is against everything we here stand for.  Maybe
a previous post asking who would be interested in receiving such a post,
and then emailing those people privately.

Maybe setup the list to deny attachments would do it?

Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner Interiors
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel M. Edwards [mailto:dme () duda com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:09 PM
> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Morning Wood Poll
>
>
> The morning wood posts themselves are not what annoy me.  It 
> is the barrage
> of posts that follow that do.  Both sides of this argument are 
> guilty.  The
> anti-wood party posts how Morning Wood is a moron after he 
> posts then the
> pro-wood party responses by calling that person a moron.  It just keeps
> going until I have 40 e-mails that can be summed by "Am Not" 
> and "Are Too".
>
>
> I like the idea for two full-disclosure lists one for 
> disclosures and one
> for discussions.
>
> Daniel M. Edwards
> Network Specialist
> A. Duda & Sons, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of 
> David Sentelle
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
>
>
> I've already cast my vote, but I think a simple yes/no is not 
> sufficient for
> the real solution.
>
> The real solution is to have a fully open full-disclosure 
> mailing list, only
> for full-disclosure.  People not disclosing vulnerabilities or 
> bugs would be
> warned then banned on repeat offenses.  
>
> To resolve the issue of ongoing correspondence regarding 
> disclosures made on
> the full-disclosure list, there would be a 
> full-disclosure-DISCUSSION list.
> That would be the 'noise' list, that would contain 99% of what 
> is currently
> in full-disclosure.
>
> This post should go to the discussion list.  Many of Morning 
> Wood's posts
> would hopefully go to the discussion list, with the 
> disclosures he's made
> going to the full-disclosure list.
>
> Would the addition of a discussion list, and the policy change for the
> full-disclosure list, really cramp anyone's freedom of speech 
> or the value
> of the full-disclosure list?
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
> are addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error, you are 
> prohibited from using, divulging any of its contents, or forwarding 
> this email.  Please notify admin () cnbcbank com and delete it from 
> your system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html