Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX?
From: Jason Coombs <jasonc () science org>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:01:55 +1300
Christoph Gruber wrote: > If a manufactorer of software gets to knowledge of a certain weakness > (vulnerability), does he have to inform the public immediatly? > Is it even worse, if the manufactorer forces everyone, who has > knowledge about that thing, to sign NDAs?Let me take your question a little further... Suppose you are a "Director" of a public company, and you have knowledge of design flaws and vulnerabilities designed into a software product on purpose?
The flaws harm investors, they harm the public, they harm information security in general. They are unethical. You inform the company that the flaws exist, and nothing is done about them. Instead, you're slowly but forcefully pushed out of the company.
You've signed an NDA. What do you do? Regards, Jason Coombs jasonc () science org _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Fwd: NDA & SOX? Christoph Gruber (Mar 11)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Jason Coombs (Mar 11)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Rob (Mar 12)
- RE: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Aditya Deshmukh (Mar 12)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Nancy Kramer (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Jason Coombs (Mar 12)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Jason Coombs (Mar 11)
